Skip to main content

Harmonized Landsat Sentinel vs Sentinel-2 2LA

  • April 17, 2024
  • 2 replies
  • 0 views

Hi,

It’s great to see HLS being available on SentinelHub! I’m interested in tracking NDVI for an AOI and I was wondering how comparable the results are with NDVI from Sentinel-2 L2A.

The inputs to HLS are Sentinel-2 L1C and Landsat 8/9 (both of top-of-atmosphere reflectance), whereas Sentinel-2 L2A is of bottom-of-atmosphere reflectance. According to HLS documentation, atmospheric correlation is applied to both inputs:

A series of radiometric and geometric corrections are applied to convert data to surface reflectance, adjust for BRDF differences, and adjust for spectral bandpass differences.

“convert to surface reflectance” → Does it mean that HLS is in fact of bottom-of-atmosphere reflectance?

Apologies in advance if this question is more suitable to HLS authors (USGS) but I thought I could get a quicker response here 🙂

2 replies

This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.


Hi KSNN,

It is probably worth confirming with the HLS authors, but referring to the data processing diagram linked in your post and our docs, the HLS is bottom-of-atmopshere / surface reflectance. However, it’s important to note that this is processed differently than a Sentinel-2 L2A product.

I think the final two bulletpoints summarise it nicely:

  • S30: MSI harmonized surface reflectance resampled to 30 m into the Sentinel-2 tiling system and adjusted to Landsat 8 spectral response function.
  • L30: OLI harmonized surface reflectance and Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) brightness temperature resampled to 30 m into the Sentinel-2 tiling system.

Source